Sex writes:
I think it's perfectly reasonable for the government to keep their paid employees in line by keeping fixed browser settings. I mean, it's the government-- it's not Kinko's, it's not Tower Records, it's not even Clear Channel...
Be grateful that they let you use the computer for recreation AT ALL. I mean, they pay you, they provide the computer, you applied for the job... Fuck a browser setting. Uncle Sam ain't paying you to surf the web all day.
My response:
I would be much more comfortable with a security measure designed to "keep me in line" if I felt it provided some measure of meaningful security. As it happens, it neither provides security, nor effectively "keeps me in line" (case in point: I am not currently "in line" or I would be, at this moment, visually checking 8,000 pages of names, ranks and serial numbers against an excell spreadsheet for data entry errors).
As for who is paying me to do what all day, getting paid to do a job only guarantees my employer a job well done. It doesn't buy my undivided attention. If I let other people dictate how I should spend the precious minutes of my life, they'd squander them freely and wonder why they couldn't have more. Maybe they'd give me a paycheck or an "employee of the month" certificate someday, but at the end of it all it would still be my life pissed away on someone else's priorities.
I do not subscribe to the notion that just because somebody is handing me a sack of silver to perform a job that I asked for, I have to ignore my own needs. A job is certainly a need. No argument there, however unpleasant that reality may be. However, it is only one among many -- and it is not the most important one by any stretch. Maintaining sanity, struggling for uncomplicated happiness, and perhaps giving back to society in a larger way than my current job affords -- these are all priorities too.
Our current bewilderingly impersonal system of tempurature controlled environments, timeclocks and abstract accountability is very far removed from the psychic center of animals whose ancestors spent 1,000,000 years fishing, beating drums, fighting, fucking and raising families in warm grassy places. Our brains are simply not wired to stare at 80,000 names, ranks and serial numbers in a row for 8 hours straight, nor cram into crowded trains and pretend not to be uncomfortable in the presence of so many other similarly situated individuals.
Whether it be for government or private industry makes no difference -- people *must* find meaning in the moments of their lives. And I'm not talking about finding meaning by accepting someone elses definition of what's important, or by being "grateful" that they "let" me have certain meted out quantities of my own life to enjoy. I'm talking about fighting for *every* moment. Its obviously not realistic to expect to win that struggle every time, but you will win often enough that continuing the fight is well worth it.
For some people, meaning comes in accepting whatever authority (be it boss, church or some other notion) offers without negotiation, hesitation or rationalization. For others, it means doing exactly the opposite. I lean toward the middle ground -- on the one hand accepting that if I'm going to do a job, its going to satisfy my employers, but on the other recognizing that every chance I get during those 12 hours a day I spend in pursuit of money, I will try to live to the fullest.
Unlike Ellison's character in the "Invisible Man", who sought to pay back society by stealing electricity from it, my intention is not punitive. I believe it was you (Sex) who recently reiterated Ellison's final message: that we must, on some level, accept the role assigned to us and make do with it the best we can. This, too, is my agenda. All I am attempting to do by performing nonassigned tasks at work is to find a way -- on my own terms -- to live within the system and yet still remain faithful to my intrinsic humanity. This is, in a way, counter-revolutionary -- it keeps me too busy to man the barricades.
Good food for thought, Sex. Keep it comin.